[The identity of Mr. H will be revealed later in this article]

Mr. H. whose identity will be revealed later.

Born in Edinburgh in 1778, the eldest and first surviving of seven children, Mr. H. was a delicate child. He matriculatd at Edinburgh University and chose to study law, aspiring beyond that to public life, funded by his profession. He also studied political economy and joined several academies and societies. In 1799 he espoused “the ancient Whig politics of England, which are at present so much out of fashion, being hated by both parties”, his mentors being David Hume and the French physiocrats. He passed advocate in 1800, but finding little success he switched to the English bar, entering Lincoln’s Inn in 1802 and becoming, in the meanwhile, acquainted with the whig lawyers and literati Romilly, Abercromby, Mackintosh and Sharp, who welcomed him as a “Northern Light”. In the same period he helped found the Edinburgh Review. He found a place in the Parliament in 1806. He opposed the control of trade by export licence to counter Bonaparte’s continental system in 1808 and, critical of the naval battering of Copenhagen, voted for Whitbread’s peace motion. He supported Catholic relief and his role model Romilly’s bid to reform criminal law. Mr. H. felt he was “made, or educated, for the sunshine of an improving community”. He was a member of the Holland House circle and, in 1810, he clearly displayed his talents in the Bullion Committee, arguing that there had been an excessive issue of paper money since the stoppage of cash payments by the Bank of England in 1797, and that bullion importation was the solution. Later he criticized the East India Company’s trade monopoly, and advocated a presbyterian chaplaincy in India. He supported Whitbread’s peace bid and was a consistent opponent of the protectionist corn laws in 1813–14. He also quizzed Castlereagh on his failure to obtain universal abolition of the slave trade during peace negotiations. The Dictionary of National Biography of 1891 stated that: “H. was a man of sound judgment and unassuming manners, of scrupulous integrity, and great amiability of character. He was a correct and forcible speaker, and though without the gift of eloquence or humour, exercised a remarkable influence in the House of Commons, owing to his personal character. Few men, with such small advantages at the outset of their career, ever acquired in such a short space of time so great a reputation among their contemporaries. As a political economist Horner ranks deservedly high.”

H. suffered from a pulmonary ailment, and during the autumn of 1816, having been advised to winter in a warmer climate, he travelled to Pisa (Italy) with his brother L. The great italian poet Ugo Foscolo, who briefly met H. at Holland House, wrote two letters of presentation to assist him during his trip to Italy, calling him “the most eminent speaker of the Parliament”.

LH

L. the brother of Mr. H.

The two brothers arrived in Pisa in November 1816 and took their residence in the Casa Cioni, Lungarno n. 727. Some weeks passed, and though the health of Mr. H. did not improve, his morale definitely did. During this period he made the acquaintance of several people in Pisa, among whom Major Langton and the family of Jessie Allen, later wife of the economist Jean Charles Sismondi. Towards the beginning of January his friend John Allen, being quite worried about the health of Mr. H., requested some advice from the physicians Baillie and Warren, who had visited Mr. H. a few weeks before his departure to Italy. He wrote him, telling him not to worry because his illness did not seem dangerous, just inconvenient, and the situation would improve as his strength would return. The physicians, nonetheless, recommended a dose of mercury pill and some carbonate of potassa. Mr. H. reported these instructions to Dr. Andrea Vaccà, a very well known physician in Pisa who seemed to be “very much in the dark” about the case but accepted to follow Mr. H.’s condition by paying him almost daily visits. At the end of January Dr. Vaccà witnessed the death of Francis North, the Earl of Guildford, a man well known to Mr. H. H. was very touched by this death, as he was then staying  in the same city of Pisa. Lord Guildford was buried, two days later, in the Old English Cemetery of Livorno. The opium therapy that Mr. H tried under the auspices of Dr. Vaccà seemed to have some very positive effects as he declared many times in his letters between the end of January and the first days of February 1817. Dr. Polidori, Byron’s personal physician, also attended him during this period in which he felt a recovery to be possible.

Unfortunately, these were all illusions: two days after he wrote his last letter to his father (on Feb. 4th, 1817), the difficulty of breathing and the cough reappeared with some severity. Dr. Vaccà, called by Mr. H.’s brother L., came at seven in the morning on Saturday, February 8th, and QUOTE found his patient labouring greatly in his breathing, with strong palpitations of the heart, and a low, intermittent, and irregular pulse; his forehead [was] covered with a cold sweat, and his face and hands [were] of leaden colour. He was, however, perfectly sensible, and spoke in [a] clear, distinct manner; expressing neither apprehension nor anxiety about himself. Various stimulating applications were tried, but they afforded no relief; the difficulty of breathing gradually increasing. L., Mr. H.’s brother, had entire confidence in the skills of Dr. Vaccà but requested, towards the afternoon, that there might be a consultation with another physician. They came together soon after four o’clock and L. received them in the adjoining room, leaving Mr. H. alone about ten minutes. On drawing aside the curtain, after having returned to the bedroom, he found his face deadly pale, his eyes fixed, and his hand cold; for a few moments he flattered himself that he had only fainted from weakness; but the sad reality was soon revealed: his brother Francis had just been taken away forever. END QUOTE?

This is how the last days and hours of Mr. H.’s life were described by his brother Leonard; Francis Horner, our Mr. H., died on February 8th, 1817 in Pisa. He was only 38 years old.

Dr. Andrea Vaccà Berlinghieri

Dr. Andrea Vaccà Berlinghieri

Dr. Vaccà requested permission to to examine the body and conduct an autopsy, which Leonard granted. Here’s the full report of Dr. Vaccà in french:

Résultat de la section du cadavre du feu M. François Horner.

Son corps n’était pas très maigre, et sa peau, surtout celle de la face, avait une teinte plombée; aux extremités des doigts elle était noire.
L’ouverture du bas ventre fit voir tous les viscères et organes contenus dans cette cavité parfaitement sains; on remarqua seulement le systême veneux gorgé de sang.
La section de la poitrine laissa voir les poumons singulièrement rapetissés, et particulièrement le poumon droit. Leur couleur était livide, et leur superficie très inégale: cette inégalité naissait d’un très grand nombre de corps blancs, transparens, de forme et de volume très inégal; les plus petits étaient comme des lentilles, les plus gros comme des amandes. De ces corps on en a voy ait beaucoup à la face antérieure des poumons, peu à la face postérieure. Ces corps étaient de petits véscicules remplis d’air; sous la compression elles reparaissaient, si on poussait de l’air dans la trachée-artère. Ces vessies n’avaient aucune communication avec le tissu cellulaire, qui unit les cellules aériennes entre elles, de manière qu’il ne s’agissait pas d’emphysème, mais de dilatation morbifique des cellules aëriennes.
Une grande partie de la substance pulmonaire, et spécialement la partie postérieure de ces organes était condensée, durcie, et, dans beaucoup de points, entièrement hépatisée. Les lobes des poumons n’étaient pas adhérents entre eux; il n’y avait pas d’adhérences entre les poumons et la pleure. Les glandes lymphatiques des bronches étaient plus volumineuses qu’à l’ordinaire, la membrane des bronches légèrement engorgée.
Le pericarde était sain; entre cette membrane et le coeur il y avait une petite quantité de sérosité. Le coeur était extrêmement flasque, et se laissait facilement déchirer par les doigts. L’oreillette droite était très dilatée, et remplie de sang. Le ventricule correspondant avait des parois très amincies, et c’était spécialement dans les parois de ce ventricule que l’on pouvait rémarquer le peu de ténacité de la substance musculaire que nous avons noté plus haut. Ce ventricule était rempli d’une substance blanche, assez compacte, fibreuse, fortement adhérente aux colonnes musculaires du ventricule. Cette substance était probablement de la lymphe plastique, formée dans les derniers moments de la vie.
Les deux autres cavités du coeur ne présentèrent rien de particulier.
Baillie (Anatomie Pathologique, ch. iv. sect. vi. et suiv.) et Lieutaud (Historia Antomica-Medica) rapportent quelques exemples d’affections pathologiques, qui ont des rapports avec celle que nous avons décrite; mais je n’en trouve pas une, où l’on ait remarqué dans le même individu le rapétissement des poumons, la dilatation d’une partie des cellules aëriennes, l’hépatisation d’une grande partie des poumons, et l’affection du coeur.

Docteur Vaccà Berlinghieri
Pise, le 12 février, 1817.

Some observations on the report by Vaccà were made by Dr. Pelham Warren a month later:

“Remarks by Dr. Pelham Warren on the above, in a Letter to John Allen, Esquire”

31, Lower Brook Street, 5th March, 1817.

Dear Sir,
I have shown Vaccà’s account to Dr. Baillie, who considers the case as exhibiting a very unusual form of disease, and one which is evidently out of the reach of medicine. The state of the heart presented no unusual appearances; the flaccidity and tender structure of its fibres being met with very frequently in individuals whose constitutional powers have failed by slow decay: the appearance within the right ventricle was a coagulum of blood, not uncommonly found in that situation after death. The condensation of the lung is also not unfrequently met with, and justifies the opinion which Dr. Baillie held to you of such an alteration of structure being the probable cause of Mr. Horner’s difficulty of breathing, which was never attributed to water in the chest, but to an obstruction of the circulation of the blood through the lungs arising from some cause not easily distinguishable. The enlargement of the air cells to the extent mentioned by Dr. Vaccà is a disorder so rare, that there are only three instances to be found in the anatomical collections with which Dr. Baillie is acquainted. The immediate cause of death appears to have been owing to the increase of the obstruction of the lungs to such an extent, as to have presented the free passage of the blood through the branches of the pulmonary artery, by which the right side of the heart became gradually gorged with blood, and its action was slowly suspended.
Yours faithfully,
Pelham Warren.

Dr. Pelham Warren

Dr. Pelham Warren

Francis’ brother Leonard revealed in his journals that “he derived the greatest comfort”, upon this trying occasion, “from the more than friendly attentions of Mrs. Drewe (the sister of Lady Mackintosh), her daughters, and the Miss Allens, her sisters, who had come to Pisa on a similar melancholy errand. They did not leave the last duties to their departed friend to be performed by strangers; and they stood by my side, when I laid the mortal remains of my dear brother in his grave, in the Protestant cemetery at Leghorn.”.

It is possible to read the other side of the story from one letter written by Jessie Allen to her future husband Jean Charles Sismondi, dated from Pisa, February 10th, 1817:

Jessie Allen-Sismondi-01b

Jessie Allen, later Mrs. Sismondi

I write to you to day a few lines only, & those very painful ones. It is to tell you that Mr. Horner died on Saturday the 8th at four o’Clock. On Friday he aired out, & was nearly as well as he had been for some time, perhaps a little more difficulty in breathing. He passed rather an unquiet night, & at 7 in the morning appeared so unwell his brother sent for Dr Vaccha [sic]. He found him with a cold sweat on his forehead, his face lead colour, & with great difficulty of breathing. He applied blisters & cataplasms ineffectually: he grew worse. Other Physicians were called in, & while they were on a consultation, he died. His body was opened this morning; the Physicians seemed puzzled to account for his immediate death, the cause of his disease was an organic defect in the formation of his lungs. The difficulty of breathing had affected his heart which was become spongy, so that you could pass your finger through it; his lungs were covered with white bladders, which on being dilated swelled to the size of small grapes & were nearly as thick – Dr Vaccha [sic] has met with no similar case, & pronounces it impossible to have saved his life beyond a few months; – his body is taken to day to Leghorn, & is to be buried on Wednesday in the ground appropriated to the English; his brother is gone there this morning to chuse the spot & have it railed in – I am glad he has something to occupy him. I never saw a man so entirely overpowered with grief as he was at first, to day he is a little more composed – we brought him here immediately, & have at least the consolation of softening his sorrow – he departs for England almost immediately & I have a great hope Mr Polidori will go with him –
Mr Horner was sensible to the last, but I do not know that he was aware of his immediate danger. We saw him the Wednesday previous, & thought he appeared so much better we were full of hope.
Will you have the goodness to see Mr Elmsly immediately & tell him had I known his direction, I would have written to him myself, but Mr L. Horner is gone to Leghorn & will not return before the post goes out; he will inform Mr Horner’s other friends at Rome; (Mr Elmsly I mean). Mr Leonard is quite incapable of writing on the subject yet.
I have passed this morning in assisting Caroline in preparing his body for the grave, you may imagine then, I have not to write further. I say nothing of the loss, it is beyond all words […]

In another letter to Mrs. Sismondi, the mother of Jean Charles, Jessie tells that she and Emma put Horner’s body in a coffin and accompanied him to the boat that would have carried him to Livorno, along the Navicelli canal. The next day the Allen sisters went to Livorno to assist to the funeral rites performed by the reverend Thomas Hall, chaplain of the British community at Livorno. Of this event we have the arid and brief words of the entry in the chaplaincy register written by Hall:
“Francis Horner Esq., a member of the British Parliament, died at Pisa on the 8th of February 1817 and was buried on the 11th following in the English burial-ground at Leghorn, by me – Thomas Hall”

The spot of the burial, chosen by the brother Leonard, was located near the south-east wall of the cemetery, not far from the grave of  Thomas Sebastian Hall, a son of the Rev. Hall who died a year and a half earlier, and right next to the spot where the same Rev. Hall would be buried seven years later. This coincidence is not the only one related to this burial, as we will see.

Within a few days or weeks the mould covering the remains of Francis Horner was protected with a simple marble slab with the following inscription:

“Here lie the remains of Francis Horner, member of the British Parliament. He died at Pisa the 8th of February 1817, aged 38.”

The above inscription was cited in a typescript transcription of a journal, that contains a short note of a visit  to the Old English Cemetery of Livorno. The passage gives us an extraordinary snapshot of the grave of Horner at a moment, between 1817 and 1820, when his final monument had not yet been erected (I have already cited this journal here). The still anonymous author, together with a number of other people (Dr. Peebles, Lady Belmore, Miss Caldwell and the two Miss Swinnerton) seemed to know Francis Horner and his acquaintances in Pisa: “…we paid a tribute of respect to the mould which covers the remains of Francis Horner. His monument has not yet been erected, but a simple marble slab protects his revered dust in the meanwhile”. The author also sketched a drawing of the area (unfortunately not included in the typescript I examined) specifying that “the stone on the left covers the grave of two sisters [in reality a sister and a brother], Frances [sic] and Louisa Jane Drewe […] who died […] the 19th of March, and […] the 10th May, 1817. Both […] had attended Mr. Horner’s funeral.”

Francis and Louisa Jane Drewe were two of the children of Caroline Allen, a sister of Jessie, and died respectively at 14 and 17 years of age. Their grave is still next to Horner’s. It appears, however, improbable that they were able to attend the funeral since they were both already ill at the time.

From Leonard Horner’s journals we know that their father decided to order a marble monument for his son’s grave in Livorno which was designed by Sir Henry Charles Englefield, the English antiquary and scientist. The same Sir Englefield was also the author of the iscription destined for the marble statue of Francis Horner ordered in 1817 from Sir Francis Chantrey and placed in Westminster Abbey in 1823.

Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey, self-portrait

Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey, self-portrait

Chantrey, Horner's Monument in Westminster

Chantrey, Horner’s Monument in Westminster’s Abbey

In June 1818 Chantrey received as well an order for a medallion portrait of Horner, to be placed on the monument at Livorno; this sculpture was completed at the end of October 1820 and presented to Leonard Horner free of charge. At this time, we can suppose the monument in Livorno to have been completed and waiting for the medallion to be placed on the side facing the central part of the cemetery.

A drawing included in the Memoirs (1843) allows us to  have a contemporary glance at the area:

Horner (Memoirs and Correspon...), detail

Between the 1820s and the 1850s several travellers witnessed the same monument, including the medallion portrait:

Katharine M. Lyell, Memoir of Leonard Horner, F.R.S., F.G.S.: Consisting of Letters to His Family and from Some of his Friends, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 186.

From Dr. Marcet – Florence, 5th March 1821.

MY DEAR HORNER,  – I wrote to you a few weeks ago, and expressed my regret at having missed the opportunity of visiting your brother’s tomb. If it were necessary to show that I was sincere in my regret, I could not produce a better proof than the excursion I have just made from Pisa (where I was induced to take a trip) to Leghorn for that purpose. I can now tell you what I think of the monument. It is truly touching by its good taste and simplicity. It would have been so easy to adorn it with this or that symbol of public services, or to swell the iscription with ostentatious titles to public gratitude! The structure has sufficient mass to catch the eye; but in the detail it can only be noticed by the total absence of pretension or laboured embellishment – By the eloquent simplicity of the inscription, and by the great likeness of the medallion. My companion made me remark that the form of the tomb might have been more elegant if the base had been somewhat larger than the superstructure, so as to resemble less a regular square, but I cannot say that the circumstance would have struck me, or that I am quite satisfied with the truth of the criticism. Mr. Martin of Leghorn (Alex Prevost’s brother-in-law) was so good as to procure for me a little sketch of the tomb, which, however slightly done, will serve to give you an idea of its appearance. It is probable that you have already procured drawings of this kind, but in that case, it may be acceptable to some of the family, and at all events you will, not scold me for having ventured to inclose it in my letter.

George Combe, The life and correspondence of Andrew Combe, 1850, 89.

There is […] an English cemetery here, containing many handsome monuments. Among others, that of Mr. Horner interested me greatly. He died, as you know, at Pisa, in 1817, still a young man. There is a bust of him. His head is among the best I have ever seen. The organs of the intellectual faculties are very large; those of the moral sentiments are beautifully developed; and the organs of Language are large.

Piero Sraffa, M. H. Dobb, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 10, 1955, 321-322.

Letter, Thursday 24 Oct.r Pisa [1822]

(…) We also saw the English Burying Ground in which we were very much interested. It is full of very handsome monuments […] but that which mostly attracted our attention was Francis Horners, who died here at Pisa and was buried there. It was raised by his father and is very handsome. There is a Basso Relievo of the deceased upon it which is I think like him. The inscription on one side is in English and on the other in Latin – it describes, and I believe justly, his talents and virtues and states that the monument was erected by his father.

Incredibly, we have another witness of the grave in the 1860s. Leonard Horner hadn’t visited his brother’s grave for nearly 45 years when he came back to the Old English Cemetery of Livorno in October 1861:

We have been to Leghorn, a train took us there in half-an-hour. We found my dear brother’s monument almost hid by bushes around it, the inscription on both sides scarcely to be seen. I have given directions for all these to be removed, and a low railing to be placed round the monument. The letters of the inscriptions which are cut in the marble, are scarcely legible, so I said that I should like them to be touched with black paint, but Susan suggested that they should be gilt, and that I have directed to be done. The space between the foot of the monument and the rail will be planted with flowers, and I shall make an arrangement that will secure its being at all times in order. The medallion is in perfect preservation. It is by far the most beautiful monument in the cemetery; it was designed by Sir Henry Englefield. To perform this duty to the memory of my brother has been a source of great comfort to me.

A few months later he came back to check the condition of the grave:

Yesterday Joanna and I went to Leghorn, my chief object was to see the repairs of my brother’s monument, which I had ordered six months before. I found all quite to my mind, the shrubs that hid it have been removed, an iron railing placed round it, the marble cleaned, and the letters of the inscription gilded. I trust that those who are to come after me, will not allow it to be neglected. No more burials are now in this cemetery, and the Committee of the English Church are having it put in complete order.

Unfortunately the wish of Leonard Horner was not to be respected for long, as the World War II bombings of Livorno in 1943 severely damaged the cemetery, including the area of Horner’s tomb, as this 1947 picture of a close-by spot demonstrates:

DSC_0603_detail

The tomb was not destroyed, however, but the upper cover was partly damaged and the plants that grew inside the then uncovered monument did the rest. In the following images it is possible to see the condition of the grave in 1987 and 2012:

Francis Horner's monument in 1987 and 2012

Francis Horner’s monument in 1987 and 2012

During the terrible period of WWII, the cemetery was not only damaged by bombs but also plundered by people searching for iron, marble and wood to be sold. It was probably for these reasons that Professors Yarrington and Sicca, who citing this grave in their works but not finding the medallion where it should be, believed it lost or stolen.

Front side of Horner's grave with the missing medallion portrait

Front side of Horner’s grave with the missing medallion portrait

In 2012 the members of the association “Livorno delle Nazioni”, during their voluntary cleaning work at the cemetery (begun in 2009), found the “lost” medallion portrait in the vicinity of Horner’s monument and successfully identified it. Immediately contacts were made with Dr. Sicca and Yarrington who confirmed the authenticity of the sculpture and a complex process was then started with the Soprintendenza di Pisa,  the Misericordia of Livorno, and the British Consulate General in Milan, to secure and transfer the work to the Fattori Museum of Livorno. A conference was held on May 17th, 2013 to announce the finding to the public and the press.

It is with great pleasure that I can show the medallion portrait, commissioned by Leonard Horner and made by Sir Francis Chantrey between 1818 and 1820, for the grave of the admired Francis Horner:

Horner-Chantrey_white_c

The above picture represents the medallion portrait in the condition in which it was found, without any restoration besides some basic removal of the dirt and plants that were covering it.

We now hope that some charity or modern Maeceanas may find the story of this tomb and its medallion of interest and allow it to be restored and returned to the monument.

Sources:

ODNB, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, online version.
Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Horner, M.P., by Leonard Horner, London, 1843
Memoir of Leonard Horner, by Katherine M Lyell (1890) (privately printed)
Toscana cosmopolita del primo Ottocento, da un carteggio inedito di Jessie Allen con Jean Charles Sismondi, Livorno, Debatte, 2006.
The Lustrous Trade: Material Culture and the History of Sculpture in England and Italy, c.1700-c.1860, edited by Cinzia Maria Sicca and Alison Yarrington, p.145

For reference:
The Guardian, Italians unveil long-lost tomb medallion of Scottish MP, by Lizzy Davies
The Telegraph, Long-lost plaque commemorating MP found in Livorno’s Old English Cemetery, by Nick Squires
LivornoNow, Revealed! Francis Chantrey’s funerary sculpture for Francis Horner’s tomb in the Old English Cemetery of Livorno, by Sarah Thompson

Advertisements